Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Calypso Jones

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 93
General Discussion / Re: Cultural Appropriation is Bullshit
« on: February 18, 2019, 09:34:08 PM »
yes I do too.

Dear Space.  Sorry to hear about your recent ill health.  I'm glad they found the problem and repaired it.  Many happy years to come.   

Hi sugarbritches.  I knew you were there.    ;D

In The News / Kamala Harris attempted to enslave prisoners
« on: February 16, 2019, 12:13:12 PM »
Harris Attempted to Reject Prison Population Reduction to Retain Cheap Labor

Kamala Harris office sought to keep inmates locked up so that California could use them for cheap labor

 Lawyers under the oversight of then-Attorney General of California Kamala Harris argued in 2014 against the release of nonviolent criminals because they wanted to keep them for cheap labor.

“Extending 2-for-1 credits to all minimum custody inmates at this time would severely impact fire camp participation — a dangerous outcome while California is in the middle of a difficult fire season and severe drought,” lawyers from Harris’s office wrote in a filing.

 The attorney general arrived at that stance in reaction to a chain of events following a 2011 Supreme Court decision ruling that California’s prison overcrowding was in violation of the Constitution’s cruel and unusual punishment clause.

 In 2014, as overcrowding persisted, a three-judge panel in California ordered the state to make eligible for parole nonviolent prisoners with only two felonies that had served half their sentences. Harris’ lawyers argued early release would harm the prison’s labor program, which included its work program to help fight California’s wildfires. The judges rejected the argument.

 Criticism against Harris resurfaced after her announcement for president last month brought heightened scrutiny. In 2014, Harris told BuzzFeed News she was “shocked” to learn about what her lawyers were arguing in court.

 Harris’s presidential campaign reiterated her claims this week to the Daily Beast: “As she said at the time, Sen. Harris was shocked and troubled by the use of this argument. She looked into it and directed the department’s attorneys



In The News / Re: MAGA assault
« on: February 15, 2019, 04:03:21 PM »
Active shooter in Aurora, Illinois, suburb of Chicago.

Jussie must be thanking his lucky stars for this to happen to take the focus off his hate crime hoax.  I wonder if he staged this too?

In The News / Presidential Hopeful Avenatti accused of
« on: February 14, 2019, 11:31:21 AM »
Hiding million, has to give up financial control of law firm.

Avenatti To Give Up Financial Control Of Law Firm After He’s Accused Of Hiding Millions

Psst, CNN, here’s your boy.

Via LA Times:

Michael Avenatti agreed Wednesday to relinquish financial control of his longtime law firm hours after a former partner filed papers accusing him of hiding millions of dollars from the court that oversaw its bankruptcy.

The celebrity lawyer and his firm, Eagan Avenatti, consented to the appointment of a receiver to take possession of its bank accounts, case files, computers and other assets.

Avenatti also promised to cooperate with efforts by Jason Frank, a former lawyer at Eagan Avenatti, to collect on his $10-million judgment against the firm. Avenatti will continue to work as the lead lawyer in his law practice, which he now calls Avenatti & Associates.

The agreement came after Frank asked U.S. District Judge Virginia A. Phillips on Tuesday night to appoint a receiver to seize Eagan Avenatti and stop the firm from draining its assets.


He could pay Porny Daniels Fines.  The Scheister.    Peps,  you really need a forum for Corrupt Leftist liars and thieves.

“I was speaking to the man who had just run for the presidency and won the election for the presidency and who might have done so with the aid of the government of Russia, our most formidable adversary on the world stage. And that was something that troubled me greatly,”

as it should have because his job is to protect the security of the United States.

he's a fracking lying son of a bitch is what he is.   You can use all the pretty sounding words you want but what these guys did was a freakin' attempted coup.   

Electronic Surveillance / DoJ discussed recruiting cabinet members
« on: February 14, 2019, 11:22:43 AM »
I think what he means is they considered blackmailing Cabinet members to turn on trump to get him out of office.  These sons of bitches deserve a firing squad...not a freakin' pension.

It is what it is...and the path leads back beyond the DOJ to its masters even though the media doesn't seem to want to talk about those implications.

McCabe Says Justice Officials Discussed Recruiting Cabinet Members to Push Trump Out of Office

Washington (CNN) Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe is confirming for the first time publicly that there were high-level discussions at the Justice Department about recruiting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove President Donald Trump from office in the aftermath of former FBI Director James Comey's firing.

The discussions also included speculation about which Cabinet members could be on board with the idea, McCabe said in an interview with CBS's Scott Pelley. According to Pelley on "CBS This Morning" Thursday, McCabe confirmed the discussion among Justice Department officials. This segment of the interview, which was taped for "60 Minutes," was not aired Thursday morning.

McCabe, who was fired from the FBI last March, also said he ordered an investigation into whether Trump obstructed justice as a way to preserve ongoing inquiries into Russian election meddling in case there was an effort to terminate them.

In September, citing sources familiar with memos authored by McCabe, CNN reported that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein discussed wearing a "wire" to record conversations with Trump and recruiting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. Also in September, an anonymous "senior official in the Trump administration" claimed in a New York Times op-ed that there had been "early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment."

It was not mentioned in the segment that aired Thursday if McCabe or anyone else approached Cabinet members directly to discuss the idea.

"These were the eight days from Comey's firing to the point that Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel. And the highest levels of American law enforcement were trying to figure out what to do with the President," Pelley said, adding that people involved were "counting noses" and speculating which Cabinet officials may be on board with the idea.

 In a statement on Thursday, a Justice Department spokesperson said Rosenstein -- who repeatedly disputed the "wire" revelation back in September -- again denied discussing the use of the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.

 "As the Deputy Attorney General previously has stated, based on his personal dealings with the President, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment, nor was the DAG in a position to consider invoking the 25th Amendment," the statement read.

McCabe ordered obstruction probe to protect Russia inquiries

 In December, CNN reported that following the firing of Comey, McCabe took the extraordinary step of opening an obstruction of justice investigation into Trump before special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed in May 2017. In the interview that aired Thursday, McCabe told Pelley he "wanted to make sure that our case was on solid ground and if somebody came in behind me and closed it and tried to walk away from it, they would not be able to do that without creating a record of why they made that decision."

 McCabe said that the day after Comey's firing and after meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, "I met with the team investigating the Russia cases and I asked the team to go back and conduct an assessment to determine where are we with these efforts and what steps do we need to take going forward."

 "I was very concerned that I was able to put the Russia case on absolutely solid ground in an indelible fashion that, were I removed quickly or reassigned or fired, that the case could not be closed or vanish in the night without a trace," said McCabe, who is promoting his forthcoming book, "The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump."

 In a statement to CBS, the White House called McCabe's investigation "completely baseless." Trump, who has frequently criticized McCabe, called him a "disgrace" on Twitter Thursday and accused him of being politically biased during his time at the FBI.

 McCabe was fired by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in March following an inspector general report that concluded he misled investigators about his role in directing other officials at the FBI to speak to The Wall Street Journal about his involvement in a public corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation. The Justice Department's watchdog has referred his findings on McCabe to the US Attorney's office in Washington for possible criminal charges. The case remains under investigation.




well.   I coulda told you losers this from the get go.  YOu think we all don't know what the hell is going on  here??     

« on: February 12, 2019, 04:26:55 PM »

Maxine 'wiggy' Waters hardest hit.

"Peach Fordy Fi.  Peach fordy Fi.  Peach Fordy Fi."

So we're adding theft and corruption to Mueller's repertoire.  Glad you recognize it.
Legal and lawful confiscation.  Guess we're at the point where it isn't hidden anymore.     Wait till it is used on the left and hear the piggy squeals.

The Media / Re: Media admits trump approval 50%
« on: February 11, 2019, 12:29:27 PM »
Monday morning. feb 11, 2019.  52%

The Media / Re: The National Enquirer
« on: February 10, 2019, 08:55:49 PM »
I am with him on tougher trade police wrt China.   That's the only policy agreement I can think of.

This is a fine thing isn't it pepsi?   Your buddies have all deserted your board Just because you allow conservative posters.   I guess that ought to show you how the left's mental capacity has diminished since the election of trump.   

Don't worry bud.  We're here for ya.   

In The News / Trump's Iran Deal withdrawal clear success
« on: February 09, 2019, 08:49:39 PM »

President Trump’s Iran-deal withdrawal is a clear success

Since the U.S. withdrawal, evidence of the JCPOA’s weaknesses and of Iranian cheating has grown stark. “Despite getting out of the Iran nuclear deal, despite the sanctions, we have little doubt that Iran’s leadership is still strategically committed to achieving deliverable nuclear weapons,” national-security adviser John Bolton told Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu last month.

Other new evidence of the JCPOA’s weakness and Iranian cheating includes the Iran “nuclear archive,” a huge cache of Iranian documents on its nuclear-weapons program. Stolen by Israeli intelligence in early 2018, they show that in 2015, in a declaration of its nuclear-weapons-related activities (the declaration was a prerequisite for Iran to receive sanctions relief under the JCPOA), Iran lied to the IAEA. The documents indicate that Iran was planning to construct five nuclear-missile warheads and constructed a secret underground tunnel complex at the Parchin military base, where it was developing nuclear-weapon components. “With current level of inspections, Iran could have an active nuclear weapons program today and IAEA would not know,” The Institute for Science and International Security said on January 14, in a tweet about the significance of the Iran nuclear archive documents. “That is one reason why Israel’s recent actions to seize a portion of the archive and expose a secret nuclear-related warehouse are so important.”

In The News / Re: Graham wants a vote on the "Green New Deal"
« on: February 09, 2019, 07:58:38 PM »
oh....the green deal is not for them. it's for us.   They are the elites.  NOTHING changes for them except way more room on those planes cause we are not allowed air travel.

NEITHER are we allowed beef because the deal is they want to eliminate the beef industry.  THEY mean to terminate the existence of all cows.   That is the truth.  She has since deleted that info from her information. 

The green new deal will mean destruction for life as WE know it.  Not so much our political and media elites.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 93