Cajun Economics

[dustup]

dust up,

I know how the monetary system is being played. You don't have to listen to Ron Paul tell you to know. Yet at the same time everyone on that page got paid something. This is how the US monetary system has worked forever.

You claimed nothing was produced. Yet someone owed for grain  that was PRODUCED to feed the PRODUCED pigs  another person had to pay for. So understand that no one wants to read anymore of this Ron Paul shit. Hes going to lose. He will not ever win. He has fooled young kids because hes and old white man who protests the war, but what these same young  people who are going to school on grants and loans do nto understand is that a Ron Paul presidency means no more financial aid. After all, government should not be sending kids to college. The founders had nothing written in the constitution saying that this was  the role of congress will be another excuse.   Next it will be government should not be in the highway business. His argument is stupid dust up. Sane people can see this. YOU are the one scared and running from truth.

.........I didn't claim anything, the article proposed it.....what other office holder is talking about this issue? ....the point which you fail to recognize is that the $100 was a good faith deposit that none of the string of users worked for.......you said, quite ignorantly , that something was produced.....but it was not produced by the person paying for it with the original good faith deposit, it was produced by the person that received it.......not by the person who paid it!...also.....I did not bring up Ron Paul.....you did! whom is 100 times more intelligent than you!  ....how many babies have you delivered?........the reason you brought Ron Paul up is........because you are afraid that if he gets elected he will put an end to the hand outs by big government and Social Policies........ ....come back when you grow some legs to stand on.......

[JC3.0]

..because you are afraid that if he gets elected he will put an end to the hand outs by big government and Social Policies.

Nobody is afraid of Ron Paul being elected. He does not and will never have enough votes. You are living in a fantasy land, captain bongwater.....

[IM2]

Dust up,

No ones afraid of Ron Paul What would happen if he got elected is exactly whats happening to the tea bags now. People would get 2/3's into his time and understand that his real plan was not what they wanted.

the point which you fail to recognize is that the $100 was a good faith deposit that none of the string of users worked for.......

Untrue.

As soon as the man walks upstairs, Bosco, the owner, grabs the bill
and runs next door to pay his debt to Boudreaux, the butcher.

Boudreaux takes the $100 and runs down the street to retire his debt
to Trosclair, the pig farmer.

Trosclair takes the $100 and heads off to pay his bill at T-Boy's
Farmers Co-op, the local supplier of feed and fuel.

T-Boy, at the Farmer's Co-op, takes the $100 and runs to pay his debt to
the local prostitute, Clarise,  who has also been facing hard times and
has had to offer her "services" on credit.

Clarise rushes to the hotel and pays off her room bill with Bosco,
the hotel owner.

All of these guys owed money, they all used this money to promptly pay off a debt owed. So then a product or service was exchanged for a promise of later payment. Therefore someone had to work. I bet you couldn't tell Clarise that she did not work. T boy was feed and fuel supplier. Therefore he offered PRODUCTS.

Bosco owed the buthcer for his meat. The butcher owed Trosclair for pigs The butcher provided a service he got paid for. Trosclair he was a product producer. Bosco owned the hotel, meaning he had rooms for a price. You see old man, you first stated that nothing was produced. Now no one worked for the money.

Ron Paul your anti government god has spent his entire fucking life in government. He's a fucking doctor, why didn't he quit working for the government and use his medical skills?

I'll tell you why.  Because its easier to bluff dufuses like you to give him millions to run around talking  about what government can't do, then he when he gets another term never do anything but wait for the next election to tell you how terrible government is again so that he can make more money.

[Case_Closed]

T Boy was black, wasn't he?

[IM2]

Probably, because if he had been the badnews type of white boy the prostitute he would have purchased would have been named tom or jim, or some other little boys name.

[Case_Closed]

Probably, because if he had been the badnews type of white boy the prostitute he would have purchased would have been named tom or jim, or some other little boys name.

On second thought, T Boy couldn't have been black.  He paid the prostitute.

Everyone knows negroes rape their "ho's".

[IM2]

The DOJ would dispute the above claim.

[Observer]

No, they wouldn't.

[IM2]

Observer,

http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/data/table_43.html

You're wrong.

[Observer]

Your own figures prove you wrong.

Whites and Hispanics combined into a single demographic comprise 80% of the US population (63.75 and 16.3% respectively).  Blacks are 12.2%. These figures are according to the 2010 Census.

65.1% of the rapes (charged) were committed by 80% of the population.

32.5% of the rapes were committed by 12.2% of the population.

Your insinuation that Whites are more likely to commit rape simply does not stand up to scrutiny.

You really should read the information in your links before you try to use it to support your arguments.

[dustup]

Dust up,

No ones afraid of Ron Paul What would happen if he got elected is exactly whats happening to the tea bags now. People would get 2/3's into his time and understand that his real plan was not what they wanted.

Untrue.

All of these guys owed money, they all used this money to promptly pay off a debt owed. So then a product or service was exchanged for a promise of later payment. Therefore someone had to work. I bet you couldn't tell Clarise that she did not work. T boy was feed and fuel supplier. Therefore he offered PRODUCTS.

Bosco owed the buthcer for his meat. The butcher owed Trosclair for pigs The butcher provided a service he got paid for. Trosclair he was a product producer. Bosco owned the hotel, meaning he had rooms for a price. You see old man, you first stated that nothing was produced. Now no one worked for the money.

Ron Paul your anti government god has spent his entire fucking life in government. He's a fucking doctor, why didn't he quit working for the government and use his medical skills?

I'll tell you why.  Because its easier to bluff dufuses like you to give him millions to run around talking  about what government can't do, then he when he gets another term never do anything but wait for the next election to tell you how terrible government is again so that he can make more money.

.....IM2....you are so ignorant it hurts!.......it figures you work for a government funded operation!  ......cause you sure can't figure out basic problems.....

....hint....."Bosco then places the $100 back on the counter so the travelling salesman will not suspect anything." ....it was (stolen) borrowed ......but paid off all the different peoples debts....... .....dimwit 

[Case_Closed]

Poor IM2.

*shakes head*

[IM2]

dufus,

The money changed hands several times paying off debts owed. That is what your story said. Yes the money ended right back in the hands of the original owner, but everyone who touched it but him paid off a debt. The $100 was originally given so that he guy could inspect a room. Therefore a service was provided for the money. So the money was not stolen.

It's funny how your side can make up all these kinds of little bullshit stories that never happen, but have no real clue on how to make things any better.

OBSERVER,

Your racism shows in how you psot:

example:65.1% of the rapes (charged) were committed by 80% of the population.

32.5% of the rapes were committed by 12.2% of the population.

So then you claiom that whites are only being charged with the crime, but the blacks and hispanics  actually committed the crime.

You really don't know what you are talking about. Crimes overall are committed by a very small percentage of the population. The reality is that 65 percent of those arrested out of a possible 100 percent of total crimes that involved rape were white. 32.5 percent of all rapes were not committed by 12.2 percent of the population no more than 65 percent of the rapes were commited by 80 percent of the population. All in all, the DOJ showed just over 10 million arrests. If a different individual commited a crime and was arrested this equals 3-3.5 percent of the overall population. So then we see that 3 percent  of the population is being arrested for  crimes.

Overall 69 percent or 7 out of ten arrests from this 3 percent are on whites. 2 are black and 1 is indian/asian.

The argument using population proportion is a racist argument. It is used only by white racists who wish to deny the fact that whites commit the most crimes and are arrested more than anyone else. The argument has no merit on its face and should not be argued by anyone claiming to have intelligence.

[dustup]

dufus,

The money changed hands several times paying off debts owed. That is what your story said. Yes the money ended right back in the hands of the original owner, but everyone who touched it but him paid off a debt. The $100 was originally given so that he guy could inspect a room. Therefore a service was provided for the money. So the money was not stolen.

It's funny how your side can make up all these kinds of little bullshit stories that never happen, but have no real clue on how to make things any better.

OBSERVER,

Your racism shows in how you psot:

example:65.1% of the rapes (charged) were committed by 80% of the population.

32.5% of the rapes were committed by 12.2% of the population.

So then you claiom that whites are only being charged with the crime, but the blacks and hispanics  actually committed the crime.

You really don't know what you are talking about. Crimes overall are committed by a very small percentage of the population. The reality is that 65 percent of those arrested out of a possible 100 percent of total crimes that involved rape were white. 32.5 percent of all rapes were not committed by 12.2 percent of the population no more than 65 percent of the rapes were commited by 80 percent of the population. All in all, the DOJ showed just over 10 million arrests. If a different individual commited a crime and was arrested this equals 3-3.5 percent of the overall population. So then we see that 3 percent  of the population is being arrested for  crimes.

Overall 69 percent or 7 out of ten arrests from this 3 percent are on whites. 2 are black and 1 is indian/asian.

The argument using population proportion is a racist argument. It is used only by white racists who wish to deny the fact that whites commit the most crimes and are arrested more than anyone else. The argument has no merit on its face and should not be argued by anyone claiming to have intelligence.

....like I said....if ignorance hurts!.....you are in pain! ....a 10 on the chart

[IM2]

dust up,

What the fuck do you know old man? NADT. You just repeat silly ass stories. Ayn Rand was a fiction writer. I don't think basing a politcal philosophy upon the works of a fiction writer is the manner in which to create sound policy.

But apparently your idol Ron Paul thinks that Ayn Rand is the solution.

We'd get better policy from Al Jaffee.

What, me worry?