It doesn't end well when guys pose like this does it?

[Case_Closed]

I really don't understand why Mornac is going to such great lengths to avoid answering my question.
 

There is no answer.

Really.  Swear to God.

[johnhp]

There is no answer.

Really.  Swear to God.

Of course there is.  There is either a yes or know as to whether Mornac has demonstrative proof.

[Case_Closed]

Of course there is.  There is either a yes or know as to whether Mornac has demonstrative proof.

The answer is obvious.  There is no "demonstrative proof" of God.

Duh.

[Case_Closed]

And even if there were, those who choose not to believe will not believe.

Duh.

[Case_Closed]

Now comes forth the argument that:  "If you cannot provide demonstrative proof that God exists, He must not exist?"

Duh.

[johnhp]

The answer is obvious.  There is no "demonstrative proof" of God.

Duh.

So you are now speaking for what Mornac believes?  Suppose Mornac believes he has demonstrative proof and offers it right here? 

[Case_Closed]

Suppose Mornac believes he has demonstrative proof and offers it right here? 

I would be impressed.

None of the non-believers would, however.

Because even if given "demonstrative proof," they would remain unbelievers.

Duh.

[johnhp]

Of course, after considering my last statement, i want to emphasize that i wrote "suppose" before that second sentence and it applies to everything in there.

[johnhp]

I would be impressed.

i would be impressed to.  Mornac rarely gives anything like an answer to a question.

[Case_Closed]

i would be impressed to.  Mornac rarely gives anything like an answer to a question.

He is not required to even acknowledge your existence.

Duh.

[Mornac]

Q. Mornac, do you have any demonstrative proof that your god exists?

--Ah! There he is. Step further out into the light lad, so we can better see your red face.

Now then, I see you have a question – along with a tacit admission that you never asked it before I started accusing you of haing invented a history of asking it. That’s good. It means that I can now post Vortex videos from here on out with your full consent and approval (as well as that of your sympathisers). On to your question then:

Yes. Here are five that I subscribe to .

[johnhp]

He is not required to even acknowledge your existence.

Duh.

i am not referring to questions i pose to him, i am referring to answering questions in general.  Certainly he is under no obligation to answer a question from anyone.  That said, you claimed you would be impressed and i agree, i would be impressed were Mornac to offer an answer to a question rather than a response.

[notoc]

--Ah! There he is. Step further out into the light lad, so we can better see your red face.

Now then, I see you have a question – along with a tacit admission that you never asked it before I started accusing you of haing invented a history of asking it. That’s good. It means that I can now post Vortex videos from here on out with your full consent and approval (as well as that of your sympathisers). On to your question then:

Yes. Here are five that I subscribe to .

Q. Mornac, do you have any demonstrative proof that your god exists?

[Case_Closed]

i am not referring to questions i pose to him, i am referring to answering questions in general.  Certainly he is under no obligation to answer a question from anyone.  That said, you claimed you would be impressed and i agree, i would be impressed were Mornac to offer an answer to a question rather than a response.

You like to twist the words of others to suit, like, whatever; don't you?

[Case_Closed]

Q. Mornac, do you have any demonstrative proof that your god exists?

I'm wondering what part of "Yes" you are having a problem with?