New Hampshire Union Leader: Obama Is A 'Glib, Clueless Disaster Of A President'

[Malone22]

• Tweet

http://www.businessinsider.com/new-hampshire-union-leader-obama-is-a-glib-clueless-disaster-of-a-president-2011-11

[johnhp]

Interesting that the editorial discusses the primaries.  i wonder how everything panned out in the general?  If i recall correctly new Hampshire voted for the " wet-behind-the-ears socialist wannabe" by right at 10 points.  So the dems were right (by less than 3%) in the primaries but the state as a whole was wrong in the general?  Must be all those "wet-behind-the-ears socialist wannabe" independents.

[Boffo]

brilliant piece of word fairy desperation extrapolation there, joannie, but the subject matter is about Mr McQuaid's insightful article on the uselessness of the Idiot in Chief.

you got anything to say topic wise?

though not, you are an empty file cabinet

[Malone22]

Interesting that the editorial discusses the primaries.  i wonder how everything panned out in the general?  If i recall correctly new Hampshire voted for the " wet-behind-the-ears socialist wannabe" by right at 10 points.  So the dems were right (by less than 3%) in the primaries but the state as a whole was wrong in the general?  Must be all those "wet-behind-the-ears socialist wannabe" independents.

Perhaps they found out what he is all about...and have regrets...

[johnhp]

brilliant piece of word fairy desperation extrapolation there, joannie, but the subject matter is about Mr McQuaid's insightful article on the uselessness of the Idiot in Chief.

you got anything to say topic wise?

though not, you are an empty file cabinet

Nothing desperate about it.  The majority of the state went for Obama by something like 19%.  He tried to use referring to the primaries in which there was less than a 3% difference as an attempt to bolster his argument.  It is rhetorical fail on his part.  Pure and simple.

[johnhp]

Perhaps they found out what he is all about...and have regrets...

They didn't write the article.  One guy did.

[Malone22]

They didn't write the article.  One guy did.

There seems to be a lot of dissatisfaction with Obama..

[johnhp]

There seems to be a lot of dissatisfaction with Obama..

Of course.  i agree there seems to be a lot of dissatisfaction with Mr. Obama.  And, yet, he will be re-elected because the republicans have nothing to offer.

[Malone22]

Of course.  i agree there seems to be a lot of dissatisfaction with Mr. Obama.  And, yet, he will be re-elected because the republicans have nothing to offer.

In this case "nothing" is better "something"

[johnhp]

In this case "nothing" is better "something"

i understand you believe that.  And you are right about the Republican nominee...it will be Romney, or, as you call him "nothing".  But he will lose in the general.

[foodserver]

Perhaps they found out what he is all about...and have regrets...

I think Malone nails it here.  I'm predicting that the level of support from likely voters the polls show 72 hours before the election will be higher than Obama's actual vote total.   Many who voted for Obama the first time around are feeling like members of the OJ Simpson jury--embarrassed and looking to hide out.  When the pollsters call they will say yes, they voted in the previous election (which qualifies them as "likely voters") and yes they support him still but they will have decided they were in over their head the first time and while they won't vote for a Republican--they won't vote...

[johnhp]

I think Malone nails it here.  I'm predicting that the level of support from likely voters the polls show 72 hours before the election will be higher than Obama's actual vote total.   Many who voted for Obama the first time around are feeling like members of the OJ Simpson jury--embarrassed and looking to hide out.  When the pollsters call they will say yes, they voted in the previous election (which qualifies them as "likely voters") and yes they support him still but they will have decided they were in over their head the first time and while they won't vote for a Republican--they won't vote...

You are predicting?  Maybe Obama should order the champagne now!

Isn't the guy you claimed was on the path to the nomination in 4th place in New Hampshire?  Isn't the guy you said would be the republican candidate the guy who actually said

"We need a leader, not a reader.”

Funniest NH Union Leader article ever.

http://www.unionleader.com/article/20111117/NEWS0605/110609989/-1/news06

[SufferedMoreThanJesus]

But he will lose in the general.

Look at you prognosticating.

[foodserver]

You are predicting?  Maybe Obama should order the champagne now!

The most important prediction (to me) is that the Republican nominee, whoever it is,  represents the winner bracket.

I've never gotten the Republican nominee right but I've never gotten the general election outcome wrong either.  Things are still lookin' good for the Republican nominee.



http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/11/voters-trust-in-republicans-holding-firm.php

[johnhp]

The most important prediction (to me) is that the Republican nominee, whoever it is,  represents the winner bracket.

I've never gotten the Republican nominee right but I've never gotten the general election outcome wrong either.  Things are still lookin' good for the Republican nominee.

So you want a leader -- love the right wing fascination with that word -- not a reader, but failing Herman "Failure" Cain as the nominee you think the republicans will win?  Way to go all in Mr. Sheen.