4th Court of Appeals throws out challenge to ACA

[dagon]

The 4th Circuit threw out the challenge by claiming the state of Virginia lacked standing to bring the suit. They didn't address the constitutionality of the law.

As a minimum, key portions of the law will be nullified by the Supreme Court.

That is a good start.

not a chance

peace

[IM2]

Rassmussen polling does not count.

Observer,

The 4th Circuit threw out the challenge by claiming the state of Virginia lacked standing to bring the suit. They didn't address the constitutionality of the law.

They had to address the constitutionality if they considered if Virginia had standing.

As a minimum, key portions of the law will be nullified by the Supreme Court.

Maybe not.

That is a good start.

Explain how.

[Case_Closed]

but to think it's going to be repealed?  no way.

It may not be "repealed," but on Day 1, every State in the nation will be issued waivers of it by a President other than Obama.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Most voters still want to repeal the national health care law, even though they tend to believe the law won’t force them to change their own health insurance coverage.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 55% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress in March 2010, while 35% at least somewhat oppose repeal. The intensity remains on the side of the law’s opponents since these findings include 42% who Strongly Favor repeal versus 26% who are Strongly Opposed.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/december_2011/53_call_for_repeal_of_health_care_law

If you think this is a non-issue to the American public, you need to knock off the narcotics.  Obama could lose the election on this issue alone.  We won't even discuss in this thread his intolerably weak foreign policy positions.

[ivanm]

It may not be "repealed," but on Day 1, every State in the nation will be issued waivers of it by a President other than Obama.

If you think this is a non-issue to the American public, you need to knock off the narcotics.  Obama could lose the election on this issue alone.  We won't even discuss in this thread his intolerably weak foreign policy positions.

If it is so popular then why have thousands of waivers already been issues? The law was intened to cover the losers but wonder boy is discovering that there are a lot of winners out there that want no part of it.  When a socialistic labor union wants a waiver then that should tell you something.  Those sobs talk the talk but ain't about the walk the walk.