An honest conservative

[johnhp]

• Tweet

On another thread, known pile, foodserver tried to derail a conversation asking if i could name any honest conservatives i know.  i presume, as i do not hang with trash, he means conservatives of whom i am aware.  With that in mind, i would like to identify the honest conservative i have recently discovered.



He is a new bagging member of congress, Steve Southerland.  He is pretty honest.  Let's look at what he has to say.

 "If you think this job pays too much, with those kinds of risks and cutting me off from my family business, I'll just tell you: This job don't mean that much to me. I had a good life in Panama City."

http://goo.gl/VajPc

For me the honesty is not so much in the content in what he says, i have no idea if he has been shot at, but his attitude.  He is an honest conservative.  He has dropped all pretense and demonstrates what a whining pile of crap he is.  And let's be honest, this guy makes 3 times what his median constituent  makes.  i would like to see more baggers this honest.

[foodserver]

OK.  Thanks John.  You say this guy is honest.  So cite the "conservative" positions he's taken and the issues in which he has an honest disagreement with you.  This will help me greatly in that instead of citing a conservative argument on my own, I'll merely quote him, so--by all means establish his bonafides for us.

He is pretty honest. 

I'm glad he's not "pretty pregnant." 

[dagon]

OK.  Thanks John.  You say this guy is honest.  So cite the "conservative" positions he's taken and the issues in which he has an honest disagreement with you.  This will help me greatly in that instead of citing a conservative argument on my own, I'll merely quote him, so--by all means establish his bonafides for us.

He is pretty honest. 

I'm glad he's not "pretty pregnant." 

oh please fs.  this is getting ridiculous.  i'll give you one and you can check out his bonafides yourself if you don't already know them.

ron paul!

he's right about some things and absolutely bonkers about others but he is honest and consistent about what he believes.

do you want to continue screwing around?  of course you do.

peace

[johnhp]

OK.  Thanks John.  You say this guy is honest.  So cite the "conservative" positions he's taken and the issues in which he has an honest disagreement with you.  This will help me greatly in that instead of citing a conservative argument on my own, I'll merely quote him, so--by all means establish his bonafides for us.

He is pretty honest. 

I'm glad he's not "pretty pregnant." 

Oh, i was pretty clear about the content of his honesty: he is honest about being a whining pile of shit.

[foodserver]

oh please fs.  this is getting ridiculous.  i'll give you one and you can check out his bonafides yourself if you don't already know them.

ron paul!

he's right about some things and absolutely bonkers about others but he is honest and consistent about what he believes.

do you want to continue screwing around?  of course you do.

peace

dagon says,

ron paul!

I agree with this.  I'm glad you think so too.  I would be happier about your outlook if you had more, but I didn't specify a number so you have answered the question.  I'm always so grateful for those rare occasions in which you do so I'll demonstrate my gratitude for leaving you alone...(for now  )

[dagon]

dagon says,

ron paul!

I agree with this.  I'm glad you think so too.  I would be happier about your outlook if you had more, but I didn't specify a number so you have answered the question.  I'm always so grateful for those rare occasions in which you do so I'll demonstrate my gratitude for leaving you alone...(for now  )

it was a stupid fucking question and an attempt to divert.  i could name loads of "conservatives" who are ideologically consistent even though i don't agree with them.

that's why it was a stupid fucking question.

peace

[foodserver]

dagon talks trainloads of trash he has no intention of backing up...

i could name loads of "conservatives" who are ideologically consistent even though i don't agree with them.

  Would they also be "not crazy" and be members of a religious denomination acceptable to you?



start anytime

[dagon]

dagon talks trainloads of trash he has no intention of backing up...

i could name loads of "conservatives" who are ideologically consistent even though i don't agree with them.

  Would they also be "not crazy" and be members of a religious denomination acceptable to you?

start anytime

more stupid fucking questions and trolling attempts to change the subject.  i told you the rules of engagement going forward.  you don't get a response when you fuck around;  especially when i've already answered your question about religious denominations acceptable to me.

i don't say you're in the bottle to divert fs.  i say it because i seriously hope that this is your problem;  because the alternative means that you have some sort of mental disorder.

peace

[foodserver]

... so by "loads of conservatives" you mean, no one else?

[dagon]

... so by "loads of conservatives" you mean, no one else?

no, i mean loads!  i also meant that i'm not going to answer any of your challenges until you stop fucking around.

peace

[johnhp]

Back to the topic: aren't all conservatives loads?

[Coit]

Back to the topic: aren't all conservatives loads?

I raised the examples of David Brooks and David Frum. What do you make of them? I don't agree with them a lot of the time but I appreciate the fact that they engage and make an effort.

[foodserver]

no, i mean loads!  i also meant that i'm not going to answer any of your challenges until you stop fucking around.

peace

'kay, give us five...

[dagon]

'kay, give us five...

i thought you only needed ONE in your original attempt at diversion but i'll do you better than 5 just to show you how fucking stupid your original question was.

ron paul
rand paul
herman cain (he's a dunce but he's consistent)
ross perot
pat buchanan (crazy racist but consistent)
grover norquist (fucking traitor to the people but consistent)
david duke (believe it or not)
erick erickson (founder of redstate; batshit insane but believes everything he says)
Larry Elder
michelle malkin (for many of the reasons listed above;  a hopelessly ignorant ideologue)


....need i go on?  THIS is why it's a fucking stupid question and an obvious attempt at diversion on your part.

[dagon]

i thought you only needed ONE in your original attempt at diversion but i'll do you better than 5 just to show you how fucking stupid your original question was.

ron paul
rand paul
herman cain (he's a dunce but he's consistent)
ross perot
pat buchanan (crazy racist but consistent)
grover norquist (fucking traitor to the people but consistent)
david duke (believe it or not)
erick erickson (founder of redstate; batshit insane but believes everything he says)
Larry Elder
michelle malkin (for many of the reasons listed above;  a hopelessly ignorant ideologue)


....need i go on?  THIS is why it's a fucking stupid question and an obvious attempt at diversion on your part.

oh, i would add bachmann because she actually believes that she is being truthful but the fact that she accepts government funds while railing against government funds excludes her from this list.

peace