Newsrake
May 23, 2012, 02:20:54 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Celebrating 8 years of bickering
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Login Register Google  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: "i voted for a socialist" -johnhp  (Read 354 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Boffo
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-35
Offline Offline

Posts: 1781



View Profile
« on: March 30, 2011, 09:23:10 AM »

how does this work, johnnie ?

YOU flit around at least two forums, countless threads squealing like a stuck pig, DEMANDING names of potential Republican candidates.

then every time a hypothetical name is offered up you launch into your patented thilly thavage attack mode  BUT when asked about YOUR real life voting history you meekly offer up "a socialist" !

are you too ashamed of this person to even mention his/her name?

was it Fidel Karl Ming?

did you even name a person or did you scrawl in "a socialist" in crayon?

WHO is the socialist party's candidate for 2012?

moron

Share this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on Print FriendlyShare this topic on TwitterShare this topic on Yahoo
Logged

"What's the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? A pit bull is delicious." -Barack Hussein Obama
johnhp
Guest
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2011, 09:40:54 AM »


how does this work, johnnie ?

YOU flit around at least two forums, countless threads squealing like a stuck pig, DEMANDING names of potential Republican candidates.


That is inaccurate.  i have asked several questions about the republican field this year.  Why is it so sparse if Obama is so beatable; which possible republican candidate can beat Obama, etc.



then every time a hypothetical name is offered up you launch into your patented thilly thavage attack mode  BUT when asked about YOUR real life voting history you meekly offer up "a socialist" !


i do not attack anyone.  i point out some serious issues with regard to the post made.  For instance, Foodserver stated that Newt had announced.  i noted that, in fact, Newt had not announced.  There is a big difference between those statements.  i also pointed out that only 2 republicans have announced, a California activist and a New York urine drinker.




are you too ashamed of this person to even mention his/her name?


i have not asked people for whom they are voting.  That is a different type of question.  You are comparing apples and oranges.  i am voting for a candidate who i know will not win.  The person is not really that consequential in that regard.  The larger issues are what i would discuss in that regard were i you (and were you interested in discussing politics and not whining).




WHO is the socialist party's candidate for 2012?



i guess it will depend on which socialist party and which candidate is nominated at their convention.  But again, this is different from asking who has announced they are running.

Logged
ivanm
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +36/-69
Online Online

Posts: 11530



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2011, 11:31:24 AM »

 " i also pointed out that only 2 republicans have announced, a California activist and a New York urine drinker."

That sort of flake should do well against the flakes the Dems put up for election.  The more bizarre they are the more attention they draw.

We haven't had a female president yet and we haven't had a queer either, so there is ample opportunity for an interesting race.  How about Palin up against Democrate rump ranger?  That oughta be a goodun'.   Roll Eyes  She'd have a field day with the pathetic sob.
Logged
ivanm
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +36/-69
Online Online

Posts: 11530



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2011, 11:35:20 AM »

I think the important positions are the Congressional seats.  When the Pubs picked up strength in the House that put the screws to Obama and his pinko crowd of lackeys in the Senate. Has anyone heard from bitch Pelosi lately?   Grin
Logged
johnhp
Guest
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2011, 03:58:20 PM »

" i also pointed out that only 2 republicans have announced, a California activist and a New York urine drinker."

That sort of flake should do well against the flakes the Dems put up for election.  The more bizarre they are the more attention they draw.

We haven't had a female president yet and we haven't had a queer either, so there is ample opportunity for an interesting race.  How about Palin up against Democrate rump ranger?  That oughta be a goodun'.   Roll Eyes  She'd have a field day with the pathetic sob.

Ivan, the only homosexual in the race is a republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal