'Anybody But' keeps looking better

[Boffo]

• Tweet

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

[IM2]

Rassmussen is a conservative polling source. Therefore the information given is invalid. You're not posting at headache buffy, you're posting where people know the truth.

[johnhp]

Although Republicans are empty suits, if they want to win the presidency they will have to nominate someone.  That's where the rubber hits the road.  All this talk of generic candidates and so firsth is just so much horse shit.

[foodserver]

Although Republicans are empty suits, if they want to win the presidency they will have to nominate someone.  That's where the rubber hits the road.  All this talk of generic candidates and so firsth is just so much horse shit.

I'm in rare agreement with J.

[IM2]

The only problem foodserver is that all republicans have are generic candidates.

[foodserver]

The only problem foodserver is that all republicans have are generic candidates.

I was actually surprised to hear the other day that Rush agrees with you.  He's characterized the Republicans as a "weak field."  I'm even more partisan that I thought I guess since I think it's a particularly strong one. 

[IM2]

Anybody but a republican is going to be the phrase come 2012.

Because what Scott Walker is doing is mild compared to the power some of the other governors are trying to take.

Foodserver, republicans don't have any strong candidates. If you think Sarah Palin is strong, then you are thinking with your dick.

[foodserver]

Anybody but a republican is going to be the phrase come 2012.

Because what Scott Walker is doing is mild compared to the power some of the other governors are trying to take.

Foodserver, republicans don't have any strong candidates. If you think Sarah Palin is strong, then you are thinking with your dick.

IM2, Sarah Palin is not a "top tier" candidate in my opinion.  Tim Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels, Mitt Romney and Bobby Jindahl are.  The irony is that both Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman are MONSTER fund raisers in the Republican Party and that is why you hear so much about them.

[IM2]

None of these guys are winners. Ol boy in jersey, he can't win either. Your party doesn't have anyone who can challenge Obama. AS long as th are not allowed to think for themselves and have to pander to the nutjobs of the base, you will not get any viable candidates in the near future.

[johnhp]

I was actually surprised to hear the other day that Rush agrees with you.  He's characterized the Republicans as a "weak field."  I'm even more partisan that I thought I guess since I think it's a particularly strong one. 

For the love of God, let Rush select the next candidate.

[johnhp]

IM2, Sarah Palin is not a "top tier" candidate in my opinion.  Tim Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels, Mitt Romney and Bobby Jindahl are.  The irony is that both Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman are MONSTER fund raisers in the Republican Party and that is why you hear so much about them.

How do you deal with Jindal's [and that is the way you spell his name] exorcism problem?