Newsrake
May 23, 2012, 05:07:12 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Celebrating 8 years of bickering
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Login Register Google  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The stimulus that wasn't  (Read 2602 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
IM2
Guest
« Reply #75 on: September 21, 2010, 06:01:18 PM »

The only problem with Mornacs theology is that God probaly does not operate in the manner in which he claims.

God is not some being who works outside of human existence. God uses our minds and hearts to make the changes he would like seen. He operates through us, if we are in tune with him, not in spite of us like Mornac believes.

So then what will Mornac say the day God does return and implements his style of government on this planet. Will he then say that government has no place?

You see mornac doesn't seem to understand that God created the concept of government.
Logged
Velleity
Guest
« Reply #76 on: September 21, 2010, 06:09:57 PM »

The only problem with Mornacs theology is that God probaly does not operate in the manner in which he claims.

God is not some being who works outside of human existence. God uses our minds and hearts to make the changes he would like seen. He operates through us, if we are in tune with him, not in spite of us like Mornac believes.

So then what will Mornac say the day God does return and implements his style of government on this planet. Will he then say that government has no place?

You see mornac doesn't seem to understand that God created the concept of government.

IM, I think all religion runs into serious problems when it is misapplied outside of the realm of faith.

Mornac doesn't understand that the separation of church and state is necessary for the survival of both church and state.
Logged
johnhp
Guest
« Reply #77 on: September 21, 2010, 06:41:29 PM »

He is a reactionary.  The language of religion is just what he uses to convey that.
Logged
Velleity
Guest
« Reply #78 on: September 21, 2010, 06:42:58 PM »

He is a reactionary.  The language of religion is just what he uses to convey that.

He admits to being a reactionary. Are you saying he's honest?
Logged
IM2
Guest
« Reply #79 on: September 21, 2010, 07:14:26 PM »

Quote
IM, I think all religion runs into serious problems when it is misapplied outside of the realm of faith.

Mornac doesn't understand that the separation of church and state is necessary for the survival of both church and state.

Reliance on relgion is the problem. God is a spiritual being, religion has nothing really to do with the nature of God. That's why there are so many contradictions between religious beleifs and Gods rules. And I totally agree with your last sentance
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal