CBO Reports that Stimulus Employs 1.4 million to 3. 3 million,

[Velleity]

He is an ass.  Let's leave it at that.

You certainly manage to make the veins in his neck pop out and you make smoke come out of his ears. What do you suppose that's about?

[IM2]

There was no census conducted during the Bush Administration.

You are wrong again.

Let's see, the 2000 census was taking place when Bush was inaugurated.

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/census_2000/

Can anyone say the word jurisdiction?

Because Observer can't.

[Observer]

Interesting that you would attribute your typing "FAILURE" to fat fingers.

There was no typing failure. Nor were any "fat" fingers involved. There were however, fingers that have been executing joint locks quite regularly for about forty years and have more strength in them than you could probably muster using your entire body on your very best day.   

I don't have time to respond to the rest of your whiny bullshit right now. I have to go pick up a new dog... something far more important than talking to you.

[IM2]

There was no typing failure. Nor were any "fat" fingers involved. There were however, fingers that have been executing joint locks quite regularly for about forty years and have more strength in them than you could probably muster using your entire body on your very best day.

OOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, here goes mister tough guy. He has been executing joint locks that take no real strength to execute. I wrestled and I have seen people who had no measurable strength who could put joint locks on people and win matches, pin opponents and/or run up the score on them. I have seen MMA fighters who have no strength make stronger men submit, so then practicing joint locks on students has no bearing on someones strength.

[johnhp]

You certainly manage to make the veins in his neck pop out and you make smoke come out of his ears. What do you suppose that's about?

Lust?

[Observer]

OOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, here goes mister tough guy. He has been executing joint locks that take no real strength to execute. I wrestled and I have seen people who had no measurable strength who could put joint locks on people and win matches, pin opponents and/or run up the score on them. I have seen MMA fighters who have no strength make stronger men submit, so then practicing joint locks on students has no bearing on someones strength.

You really are clueless.

I can see now why you ran and hid.

[Observer]

Lust?

I am sure you wish it was lust. However, I am not Velleity or IM.

You are just out of luck.

[dagon]

I am sure you wish it was lust. However, I am not Velleity or IM.

You are just out of luck.

you still haven't answered the question obs.

peace

[Observer]

What question would that be, Dogshit?

[Velleity]

There was no typing failure. Nor were any "fat" fingers involved. There were however, fingers that have been executing joint locks quite regularly for about forty years and have more strength in them than you could probably muster using your entire body on your very best day.   

I don't have time to respond to the rest of your whiny bullshit right now. I have to go pick up a new dog... something far more important than talking to you.

Now you're backpedaling on that too.

No offense, but I'm not really interested in your fingers or your joint locks. What I'm interested in doing is countering the violence you're doing to the truth. In this instance you made a few desperate, ill-conceived assertions and you know it.

I would have no problem with you if you fessed up to your error. Your Heritage Foundation derivative article may or may not have merit. I honestly don't know. It is certainly conceivable that CBO is doing violence to the truth but I don't have any real proof of that and frankly your article doesn't do much better at debunking the CBO's conclusions than you do, except to say that their criticism is feasible while yours was ridiculous and completely unfounded.

[johnhp]

I am sure you wish it was lust. However, I am not Velleity or IM.

You are just out of luck.

Here is your problem, Observer.  You are obsessed.  It seems that you cannot live with out me.  You have to try and divert conversations into bizarre screaming matches because you are unable to answer basic questions.  You blame me for pointing this out and showing what a moron you are each time you post.  i am sorry you have such a fragile ego.

Maybe you should stick to investigating the pilfering of twinkies and what not.

[Velleity]

. . .  so then practicing joint locks on students has no bearing on someones strength.

An interesting point, but not totally accurate.

My "weakness" in martial arts has been my natural tendency to muscle through things. This actually slows me down and the problem is that there is always someone who stronger.

It's not that strength has no bearing so much as when and how you muster that strength. Obviously strength is an advantage if you know how and when to use it. If you don't it can be used against you.

[Observer]

Now you're backpedaling on that too.

Backpedaling on what?

I often hit the caps lock key without realizing it until I have typed a few words. That is the result of having large hands.

No offense, but I'm not really interested in your fingers or your joint locks.

Of course you are.

What I'm interested in doing is countering the violence you're doing to the truth. In this instance you made a few desperate, ill-conceived assertions and you know it.

Refute them... if you can.

I would have no problem with you if you fessed up to your error. Your Heritage Foundation derivative article may or may not have merit. I honestly don't know. It is certainly conceivable that CBO is doing violence to the truth but I don't have any real proof of that and frankly your article doesn't do much better at debunking the CBO's conclusions than you do, except to say that their criticism is feasible while yours was ridiculous and completely unfounded.

Are you really trying to tell me that the number of people hired to carry out the census is not included in the administration's employment figures and those numbers did not result in a spike (although a temporary one) in those figures?

Are you incapable of being honest even about something so glaringly obvious?

[Observer]

Here is your problem, Observer.  You are obsessed.  It seems that you cannot live with out me.  You have to try and divert conversations into bizarre screaming matches because you are unable to answer basic questions.  You blame me for pointing this out and showing what a moron you are each time you post.  i am sorry you have such a fragile ego.

Maybe you should stick to investigating the pilfering of twinkies and what not.

Just can't stay away, can you?

You really are a sick fuck. How is that whole hanging out in men's rooms thing working for you?

[Observer]

An interesting point, but not totally accurate.

My "weakness" in martial arts has been my natural tendency to muscle through things. This actually slows me down and the problem is that there is always someone who stronger.

It's not that strength has no bearing so much as when and how you muster that strength. Obviously strength is an advantage if you know how and when to use it. If you don't it can be used against you.

Anyone who does not believe strength is a key factor in controlling an opponent is an idiot.