Dreams of Neo-cons

[johnhp]

You do have trouble keeping up with discussions, don't you?

I responded to someone who was ranting and repeating the Leftist lie that the reason we invaded Iraq was WMDs. I posted the Congressional Resolution authorizing the use of military force in Iraq. That resolution lays out line by line, the reasons the use of military force was authorized. THOSE are the reasons. It doesn't matter what you say or how many times you saying or how much you are foaming at the mouth when you say it. The reasons we invaded Iraq are specified in that Resolution.

If that is too complicated for you to understand, there isn't a whole lot I can do for you. As I have said before... I can present you the facts. I cannot understand them for you.

Enough of your running.  You wrote the following:

Duelfer himself conceded there was "credible evidence" that Saddam may have moved weapons stockpiles out of the country before the invasion.

Where does the document specify stockpiles?

[Observer]

Do you know the definition of "stockpile"?

Look it up like a good little boy.

[Velleity]

. . . the Leftist lie that the reason we invaded Iraq was WMDs.

How utterly ridiculous you are. President Bush himself stated on national television that the reason for invading Iraq was WMD.

I know this for a fact because I saw it with my own two eyes. It is also common knowledge.

[johnhp]

Do you know the definition of "stockpile"?

Look it up like a good little boy.

Enough of your running.  You wrote the following:

Duelfer himself conceded there was "credible evidence" that Saddam may have moved weapons stockpiles out of the country before the invasion.

Where does the document specify stockpiles?

[Velleity]

Do you know the definition of "stockpile"?

Look it up like a good little boy.

Here's a novel idea--why don't you dispense with the bullshit and just answer his question?

Here's some language you could use: "I'm sorry John but I misspoke. You're right. The document says nothing about stockpiles. Thank you for pointing out my error."

Now you have the words. Feel free to use them.

[Observer]

How utterly ridiculous you are. President Bush himself stated on national television that the reason for invading Iraq was WMD.

Let me see... who authorized the use of military force in Iraq?

I believe it was the One Hundred Seventh CONGRESS.

I know this for a fact because I saw it with my own two eyes.

Well, that is authoritative.    Okay, not really.

It is also common knowledge.

So was the Geocentric Theory.

[Observer]

Here's a novel idea--why don't you dispense with the bullshit and just answer his question?

Because it is an irrelevant question.

Here's some language you could use: "I'm sorry John but I misspoke. You're right. The document says nothing about stockpiles. Thank you for pointing out my error."

I suppose I could say that, but it wouldn't be true.

[Observer]

It is pretty obvious your boy doesn't know what a stockpile is.

Do YOU?

[johnhp]

It is pretty obvious your boy doesn't know what a stockpile is.

Do YOU?

What is obvious is that you are running.  You wrote the following:

Duelfer himself conceded there was "credible evidence" that Saddam may have moved weapons stockpiles out of the country before the invasion.

Where does the document specify stockpiles?

[Observer]

You are past the boring point again, John.

It is obvious you are still blowing smoke to try to cover your lies.

Have you looked up "stockpile" in your stack of dictionaries, yet?

[IM2]

The continued denial about everythnig  is bad. Its almost to a point of psychosis.

[johnhp]

You are past the boring point again, John.

It is obvious you are still blowing smoke to try to cover your lies.

Have you looked up "stockpile" in your stack of dictionaries, yet?

i understand that holding you to your claims is boring for you.  What is obvious is that you are running.  You wrote the following:

Duelfer himself conceded there was "credible evidence" that Saddam may have moved weapons stockpiles out of the country before the invasion.

Where does the document specify stockpiles?

[johnhp]

The continued denial about everythnig  is bad. Its almost to a point of psychosis.

i am going to have to disagree here IM.  Almost?  Way past the point of no return i think.

[Observer]

The continued denial about everythnig  is bad. Its almost to a point of psychosis.

Talk to me when you are willing to admit you are a coward and a racist.

Until you come to grips with that, you have no business talking about denial.

[Observer]

Where does the document specify stockpiles?

Still figured out what a stockpile is, eh?

Pitiful.