Welcome to NewsRake Fairly Balanced
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Well I guess Obama CAN say he has had no scandals if you guys refuse to even see what he's done. Just know that Hillary would be president if Obama had been the bestest president evah. You got over half the country that definitely disagrees with you. There's a clue in there.
So, you were pestering me for a list of what the Right did to Obama and I provided one. To what end? Was there any more you wanted to say about it?
The bitch claims she has "more than half the country," which also is a baldfaced lie. She has stated her purpose here. She is here to troll. Why? Who cares? But I do like these discussions with you. I hope you don't mind me butting in.
No, not at all.
I'm just trying to keep my thread the Most Popular Topic.
She's wrong about everything she posts and she knows it full well. That's the way they all are. The profess to detest liars, yet they worship the world's biggest liar. They're fakes. They come here to be jerks. I posted a list of Drumpf's biggest whoppers compiled by NBC news and Holly bare ass drew lines through it. That's their level of debate. Pepsi complained that my bum bum pics distracted from discussion. There is no discussion with them. That's how I know they're divorced. No human being could stand living with them for long.
They'll dismiss factual sourcing as "fake news," or they'll draw lines through the article followed by a grinning emoticon, or else they'll abscond without following up on their gaffe. Their idea of reliable sourcing is "Daily Caller" or "Church Militant."
Yep. They all just dropped the topic of whether or not the number of justices on the SCOTUS is fixed by the Constitution (it's not). CJ even posted a bunch of related information that she didn't understand, to "prove" their point. Mornac didn't understand it either. I just wonder if they still think they're correct or if they're just too embarrassed to discuss it any further, but the fact that they tried to use information to bolster their case that neither of them understood is what makes me think they often just don't have the facilities to know when they're full of shit.
no....what you're tryng to do is to keep your side intact. You can't have anyone on the left being civil to the other side here.
No, I'm not concerned about that. Your comment might be more applicable to someone else, but not so much to me.
I especially like how they know positively that Robert Mueller will have nothing on Trump. It's magical how they get their inside information on the FBI. They are fully versed in investigative procedures. They spent years watching HIllary grilled over Ben Ghazi, and now after just over a year, they conclude that Mueller has nothing, keeping in mind that Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort have yet to testify, and that Mueller himself is a Republican, as is James Comey.